The proposal to increase VAT from 16% to 20% starting in 2026 is generating nationwide debate. But beyond fiscal discussions, there is a critical point few are analyzing: this forced digitalization is coming to a country deeply vulnerable to bank fraud, identity theft, and a lack of real user protection. Before mandating electronic payments, Mexico needs digital security, education, and minimum guarantees that won’t leave citizens exposed.
Here’s why the reform, as currently proposed, could become a social and economic risk for millions.
The Digital Transformation and Telecommunications Agency (ATDT), led by Pepe Merino, seeks to justify the VAT increase based on three arguments: raising revenue, reducing cash usage, and accelerating electronic payments.
The problem is that Mexico is not Europe or the United States. Here:
Every year, Mexicans lose over 80 billion pesos due to card cloning, phishing, fake apps, and digital scams. And yet, the responsibility falls entirely on the user.
If cash moves to 20% VAT and digital payments are encouraged without protection, who will absorb the losses when fraud spikes?
The current answer is brutal: you will.
SILIKN’s investigative unit warns that no country should push a fiscal reform dependent on digital payments without first guaranteeing:
None of this exists today.
This means the digitalization would be forced, unequal, and unsafe, placing the highest risks on those least able to bear them.
Learn more: 500,000 Passwords and Sensitive Data of Mexicans Leaked on Telegram
According to the National Financial Inclusion Survey (2024):
In markets, public transport, street vendors, and rural areas, cash isn’t a preference—it is the only possible payment method.
Raising VAT without addressing inequality forces the poorest to pay proportionally more for basic needs.
Financial exclusion is compounded by technological exclusion. INEGI and Coneval data shows:
What is the point of pushing electronic payments in a country where millions still lack phone signal at home?
For these populations, a VAT increase is not a fiscal adjustment—it is a direct punishment.
Studies from Banco de México and CIEP estimate that the VAT increase would cause 3.2% to 3.6% additional inflation in the first year alone.
Basic expenses would increase immediately:
In low-income households—where 80% of money goes to taxed goods—the impact would be devastating.
And instead of reducing informality, the reform could increase it. Why?
Because more people would attempt to avoid the tax through informal markets, cash deals, and off-the-books microeconomies.
Similar titles: Ransomware in Mexico: Cyberattacks Cause Major IT Sector Losses
The government claims the measure could raise between 320 and 380 billion pesos.
However, independent analyses show something even more revealing: the same amount could be raised simply by eliminating privileges and excessive spending among officials.
The most effective measures include:
Total: 400–441 billion pesos, more than what the VAT increase would collect.
And all without touching citizens’ pockets.
The data is clear: Mexico has extremely high digital fraud exposure, uneven infrastructure, and a population that still depends on cash.
Forcing electronic payments without first securing the financial ecosystem would be irresponsible and would put millions at risk.
This is not modernization—it is shifting the fiscal burden and digital insecurity onto those least equipped to defend themselves.
At TecnetOne, we have said it repeatedly: digitalization must come with protection, education, and public policies that defend the citizen—not the other way around.